
This makes sense, right?

This makes sense, right?
One word describes this photo for me: uncomfortable.
No one ever said modelling was easy, but if you’re a decent photographer who makes good decisions, all that effort you put into balancing on something not meant to be balanced on will pay off in the end. Right?
Not in this case.
The pose and the composition of the shot makes me — and apparently the model — cringe. How, out of all the digital shots he must have fired, did he select the one wince-tastic one to decorate his portfolio with? And don’t even get me started on the obviously tweaked in photoshop color saturation…
Do it better:
Everyone loves a vintage hawaiian theme, but what do you do when your female model and your male model can’t be there the same day? Fix it in post! See here as he seamlessly superimposes the two together.
One of the first things we learn in art class is perspective and this violates that very basic rule. It’s not artsy, it’s just bad.
Do it better:
…is the bad photography and photoshopping.
Sure, the composition is good — tough to mess up a very basic pose. But the two big things that annoy me are the lighting, or lack thereof, and the bad photoshopping.
That harsh lighting is causing a hard shadow behind her, which looks very unprofessional. And let’s talk location: where the hell is she? Because the shot is so tight, you can’t tell if she’s in a seedy alleyway (cool) or next to an elementary school (not cool). Because of the lack of context, the theme is lost.
And dude, if you’re going to photoshop something into a photo, study it in real life first. That lens flare is not fooling anyone. The flashlight would have to be pointed directly into the lens for it to achieve that, which it clearly isn’t.
Do it better